Translate

Friday 28 August 2020

Noughts + Crosses: A Review of the 4th episode of the popular BBC drama series

Rating: 5 stars ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

The below review contains a few spoilers as to what has already happened so far in the series, so make sure you watch the previous episodes and read my reviews first.

Links to previous reviews:

On the day I write this, it is the 57th anniversary of the famous speech given by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., ‘I Have A Dream’. It is also 187 years since Britain passed an act to abolish slavery in parts of the Empire.

We would like to think that by now, racism should have been effaced from the face of society. The reality is, it hasn’t. Martin Luther King’s dream is still a dream.

I can’t tell you how much this frustrates me and fills me with despair. This week alone, we have heard about the case of Jacob Blake, shot seven times in the back by U.S. police officers, and now left paralysed. Today it was revealed that despite his paralysis, Jacob Blake was handcuffed to his hospital bed. Blake was unarmed and helping to diffuse a domestic incident when he was attacked by police officers; the same cannot be said for a 17-year-old white supremacist who killed two people at a protest – and walked free, within plain sight of police officers, immediately after his crime.


Source: @denny_ow, Instagram

Although the dystopian world of Noughts + Crosses flips our reality upside down, so that black people (Crosses) are the ruling race and white people (Noughts) are the subjugated group, this fourth episode provides cogent social commentary on the state of the world in which we live. Noughts + Crosses forces us to flip the mirror back on ourselves and examine our own reality. And, sadly, we are deeply and truly found wanting.

At the opening of episode 4, we are drawn into a scene of mourning, as the Hadley family and others lay flowers in memory of those killed in the attack on Demwa Hospital. Unsurprisingly, Home Secretary Kamal’s knee-jerk response is to order even stricter force to be used by the police (you can trust he means against Noughts, not Crosses). Having learnt that the Hadley family was the target of the crime, there is no hope of appeasing him.

Cracks begin to appear in Sephy and Callum’s relationship. Trust is eroded, beginning with Sephy doubting Callum’s integrity.

Sephy is shocked that Callum knew that the bomb was going to explode before it went off. 

Brief moment of levity! This response from Ryan makes me laugh every time.

Meggie plays the role of the strong matriarch very well. Played by Helen Baxendale, she is portrayed in much the same way as the 'strong black woman' that we so often hear of. Though she is going through trials of her own, having lost her job, she is expected to hold the household together so it doesn’t crumble. She must be strong for everyone else. Although it is intended positively, this notion of the 'strong black woman' is actually very harmful. The pressure to be everything to everyone else is detrimental to one’s mental health.

Despite this, Meggie continues to do the best she can by her children. The conversation she has with Callum where she warns him of the danger he is getting himself into by having a relationship with Sephy, is significant. It represents the action of a mother trying to protect her son from harm, in a world where Noughts are deemed, as Ryan later says, “less than nothing”.

An example of treating Noughts as though they are naught comes in the next scene: the news report Sephy watches features the newsreader uttering the words: “The victims of the Demwa Hospital bomb have now been named …”

The news report in fact only names two of the victims – the only two who are Crosses. Not only is the Nought victim not named, their photo is not shown. The word 'victim' is not assigned to the Nought; we only know they existed and died because of this sentence: “The third casualty of the bomb was a Nought cleaner at the hospital.” The line is a throwaway: their life is deemed as of little value, not only because they were a Nought, but also because they were doing a working-class job. Noughts + Crosses is excellent in sharpening our focus on social injustice.

One character who will never care about social injustice is Kamal Hadley. He is a vitriolic racist with very disturbing ideas. In being romantically involved with Callum, Sephy is going against everything her father believes in and stands for.

Prime Minister Opal Folami loves to remind who's boss, and I love it! It is powerful seeing a female Prime Minister.

Ahaha - you need to watch to see Kamal's face after this bombshell! IN YO FACE MISTA!

The Prime Minister Opal Folami, conversely, is a refreshing character. Noughts + Crosses choosing a female to be Prime Minister is not a coincidence. While this dystopian world is primarily focused on the dynamics between Noughts and Crosses and deep-seated racism, it does not shy away from social commentary on gender inequality. To succeed in a man’s world is quite a feat, and despite her rise to the top, Opal is frequently met with resistance from her male colleagues.  

Police Brutality 


How many police officers do you need to arrest ONE person?

The difficult but unavoidable topic of police brutality comes to the fore like never before in this episode. Having been tipped by the Hadleys, dozens of police officers storm into the McGregor home to arrest the bomb suspect. Dozens. I only wish this were unrealistic, but the scenes we see in the States these days mirror exactly that; just, the officers are of a different hue.

This scene is chilling.

Unperturbed by the trouble he has caused for the McGregor family, Liberation Militia leader Jack Dorn – aka eternal opportunist, sips on a cup of tea. Not for long, though.

Callum is pummelled by a police officer whilst in custody, for a crime there is no evidence of him committing.

Some might say that police brutality is only a problem in the States. That isn’t true. Black people are victims of disproportionate force by the police in the UK, too. France has the same problem. Studies reveal that black people in England and Wales are five times more likely to have force used against them than white people. Although black people only account for about 3% of the UK population, 8% of police custody deaths take black lives. Callum McGregor doesn’t die in police custody, but in the real United Kingdom, Christopher Alder did – and so many others. We don’t know their names. We should.

Bloody and feeble – at the very weakest we’ve ever seen him – Callum is told by a menacing constable that it is because of Sephy that he is in this cell. We feel the betrayal hit him, take his breath.

Jude schools Sephy when she arrives at their house.

Sephy’s naivety is still alive and kicking, clearly.


Sephy’s ignorance puts Callum’s family in harm’s way. Her explanation for giving Callum’s name to her father is: “I didn’t think this would happen, I swear, Callum. I just thought that they were going to talk to you.” 🤦🏾🤦🏾

Nah mate, she still doesn’t. 🤦🏾‍♀‍



Well said.

Protecting Each Other

There is definitely a theme in this episode of protecting one’s loved ones from harm. Ryan takes the rap for Jude, despite his innocence.


When he is threatened by another inmate, Ryan is protected by a prison officer. 

The prison officer sees off Ryan’s aggressor.

Although she ultimately chooses to protect her son over her husband, Meggie does, for once, let her emotions go. 

Meggie flies at Jude in rage

The moment where she collapses into a bench, her body wracked with sobs, is a poignant one. It is the moment where Meggie’s Superwoman cape finally comes off, and she is allowed to be human.

As much as Lekan is an odious character, in this episode he does show some signs of having tried to protect Sephy – from the ramifications if it were discovered that she is in an illegal relationship. His grace doesn’t last long, though.

In keeping with the theme of looking out for one another, Jasmine extends an olive branch to Meggie – and offers to help the McGregors.

The wordless acceptance of an embrace from Jasmine signals that Meggie is willing to forgive her.

Her name is Ananya – it’s not that hard to pronounce!

I love how Noughts + Crosses does not limit itself to depicting overt racism, but also addresses the subtle behaviours people exhibit to constantly make a group different to them feel “other”. Jasmine’s failure to correctly grasp how to pronounce Ryan’s advocate’s name is an example. Interestingly, Ananya is neither a Nought nor a Cross – she appears to be of what we would call, Asian descent – but what is she in the world of Noughts + Crosses? We are never told.

Jasmine pays for one of the best defence lawyers in Albion to represent Ryan.

Noughts + Crosses outdoes itself in the costume design. Here Segun Okoro wears a traditional Yoruba agbada as his court suit, and a fila atop his head.

Ryan’s lawyer is a welcome break from the bigoted Crosses we have seen so much of already. He prepares the reporters for the hearing about to take place by characterising "an entire people, traduced and victimised on a daily basis".

The stage is set.  And the McGregors rise to the challenge.

The Noughts speak, and the Crosses listen.

There are audible gasps when Callum reveals that he has been stopped by the police “maybe, three hundred times” – despite having no criminal record. Never charged, but “stopped and searched, asked where I was going, who I was going to see… And sometimes they make me sit in a police car whilst they radio into the station, to see if I’m wanted for anything.”


Imagine having a judge in gele in real life: how cool would that be?!

When Ryan takes to the stand, his words too, are powerful. 

[I felt anger] when my cousin was beaten up so badly by the police, he was paralysed from the waist down. Or when the girl I went to school with was raped by her Cross manager and then took her own life when she was told that no charges would be brought”

he tells us.

“Every Nought in there, they won’t have one of those stories, they’ll have twenty”, he adds.

He reminds Crosses that they are part of these stories, too – they are the ones who perpetuate the cycle. This scene hits close to home for any black person, and any person of colour, for whom racism is not TV fiction, but daily reality.

Jack Dorn’s not the only opportunist in this episode…

Callum, Meggie and Jude sit nervously as they wait for the judge’s verdict.

Who wears a sleeveless dress to a final court hearing? It’s not a wedding, Sephy!

After the verdict


I’m not going to tell you any more of what happens in episode 4. I’m just going to tell you to watch it for yourself. 

All six episodes of Noughts + Crosses are available to watch on BBC iPlayer and various other streaming services outside of the UK. Go and watch it! I've tried not to give away any key spoilers!


If you would like to do something to help Jacob Blake, mentioned earlier in this article, please sign this petition.

Monday 24 August 2020

Married / Coupled Peeps: Here are some things that most single people will never tell you.

(But I will.)

I told you in my last post I was coming for the married or coupled folk. I wasn’t joking.

Some people think that because we single folk are unpartnered, we have no clue about anything to do with relationships and marriage. We seriously beg to differ. Just, not all of your single friends will tell you that to your face, coupled peeps. But hey, you know me – I will! (Or I’ll tell it to your screen.)

1. You don’t need to try and set us up every minute of every day.

Thankfully, my friends know me well enough not to try that nonsense on me! As someone that’s chosen to never go on a date (to date), they would rightfully not rate their chances of setting me up on a blind date! Still, that doesn’t mean people don’t drop very loaded hints involving me and any black Christian dude they see! Yep, let’s talk about that. Not every black single person wants to be with the other black single person that runs in their circles. When was the last time you were with a blonde single female friend, spotted a blond single guy in the room and said to your friend, “Oh, I bet you two will end up together – it’s fate!” Complexion and hair similarities do not equate to relational compatibility. So can the myth that all people of colour operate under this rule please dissipate now, in the name of Jesus. (That was one of those prayers that is dependent upon people changing their actions; please don’t think that because I invoked Jesus you are excused from doing that, if you’re one of those types!)

I know that people are well-meaning, but asking a single person every time you see them if they are on the road to the wedding aisle can get a bit annoying, for lack of a better word.

It’s not the first time I’ve said this, (remember this post?but in a person that is actually genuinely content with their singlehood, you can stir up a measure of discontent by doing this. You can make them start to wonder if there is something wrong with them. If marriage and relationships are on such a high pedestal, and I’m at the foot of the stage, why is that? Do I need a leg-up? I had to fight this feeling: it came to a point where virtually every week, married people were interrogating me on my love life (lack thereof) – or simply pushing the agenda too strongly – and I had to be on guard, realising that their words had the potential to foster dissatisfaction in me. I had to reason with these well-meaning people: marriage is good and all (well, it can be), but my life has value without me having someone by my side – and I’m not ready to walk down the aisle yet!

Married and coupled people, I guess you just want to see us poor little single folk happy. But, get this: 

What if singlehood isn’t a time of misery and forlornness? 😱 What if your single friends are… wait for it; wait for it… ACTUALLY NOT SOBBING OVER TUBS OF ICE-CREAM EVERY NIGHT?!

What you think we’re like:

ME:

If you’ve come to know me, either in person or through reading this blog, you’ll know that the picture of singleness that our culture has come to have you believe in, is pretty far removed from my reality.

Maybe give a thought to the fact that there are a lot of other single people out there like me? And maybe stop trying to give your single friends pills, as though their singleness is a disease in need of a cure.

2. We are watching you. And some of you have put us off marriage.

Ooh! Harsh? Sorry, you know me: real, authentic? 

Like I said before, just because I’m not married doesn’t mean I have no clue about marriage – although, of course, I lack the ultimate direct experience that married folks have. I have lived with married couples over the years; I have observed them from a close distance. Don’t think that your single friends aren’t watching you (in an entirely non-creepy way).

From some marriages, I have learnt exactly what NOT to do. Marriages where unhealthy control is in the hands of one spouse, and their partner is under their thumb. Marriages where one partner is always putting the other down, whether in a small group of people or in public. Marriages where communication consists of constantly shouting at each other. Sorry, but these are exactly the types of marriages that put people off ever getting married.

I can assure you, this is not hypothetical. I have a number of friends who do not want to get married because of the terrible examples of marriage they saw first-hand. The case is different for me: the unhealthy relationships I have witnessed have simply schooled me on exactly how I do not want to be, should I ever get married.


It follows then, that if I learn from the worst examples of marriage, I also learn from the best. I’ve been blessed to witness some beautiful marriages over the years: marriages where both spouses respect each other in mutual submission; marriages where the husband treats his wife like a queen, and she blossoms under his attention; marriages where the two partners are the best of friends and laugh together like little kids. I’m not so naïve as to think that all the moments of beautiful marriages are like this; of course these well-matched couples also have their moments of frustration and conflict and temporarily disliking one another, but they have developed a toolkit to iron out the cracks when they appear.

Those are the types of marriages I like to watch. The other types of marriages make me squirm. (I’m not saying that marriages aren’t hard or expecting marriages to be perfect.) Married and coupled peeps, you may not realise it, but you can either be a fantastic advertisement for marriage, or you can fantastically defame it. 

3. We know you’re married or in a relationship, you don’t need to flash it in our faces every second of every day. Ta.

I’ve told you before, I’m a hopeless romantic. Weddings are always my favourite events on the yearly calendar. I love love (love is not just romantic of course, but I do love romantic love). There is something very beautiful about seeing two people commit to doing life together for the rest of their lives, no matter how strong the waves that will attempt to divide them and carry them off shore.

I am absolutely in favour of committed couples showing their love to each other. In fact, I think it’s strange if they try to hide it. Growing up, I know several couples that would not sit next to each other in church, and you would absolutely never see holding hands. Perhaps that was a cultural thing, but it did make me sad that marital affection didn’t seem to be celebrated; more the status of marriage.

That said, I absolutely do think there’s a limit to how much PDA (public displays of affection) is appropriate. You’ve probably seen the couples that simulate sex in public places (I saw one at a McDonalds in Germany once: wasn’t fun). Get a room, people!

Not saying I have friends that go that far (thankfully), but there are definitely acts of affection that I would rather not see.

Spare a thought for your single friends. As I mentioned in my last post, I’m now in a place where marriage isn’t a far-off, distant thought. It can be hard sometimes to be around so many couples, because you feel like the odd one out, and being around people that have something that you don’t, magnifies your awareness of what you don’t have.

This lady found a way to create laughter from her third-wheel status! Source: https://www.virascoop.com/woman-documents-her-life-as-third-wheel-in-hilarious-selfies-becomes-internet-celebrity/


I’m not saying that people in relationships should feel guilty for being happy.

Romans 14:13 of the Bible talks about not putting a stumbling block in the way of our loved ones. That verse is often applied within the Church to the conversation around modesty, but in fact, in refers to doing anything that makes life “more difficult than it already is” for someone who is trying to be holy.

Let me give an example to illustrate. I lost my dad when I was thirteen. When I see my friends with their fathers, or talking about how wonderful their fathers are, it magnifies the sense of loss that I already feel in not having a father. It is not my friends’ fault that I no longer have an earthly dad, but there are things that they can do to soften the blow. Be sensitive.

Similarly, though it is not your fault that your single friends are unpartnered – and of course it is their responsibility to deal with any dissatisfaction they may feel about this – there are things that you can do to make their reality a little easier, in a world that already prizes relationships and undervalues their current status. That goes for the social media world as much as for the social world.

So, maybe next time you reach across with the intent to stroke your wife’s hair for most of the church service, you could maybe spare a thought for your single friend sitting beside you both, and save the hair stroke for the journey home? 

4. Just because I’m single doesn’t mean I want your partner.

OK, people. Just because your friends are single doesn’t mean they are thirsty.

I find it really irritating that many assume a single person is more likely to stir up trouble within a committed relationship than all these here coupled folk that you interact with. I’m not saying that boundaries are not necessary (in fact, I am a hearty proponent of healthy boundaries between unmarried people); what I am saying is that just because your friend is single, does not mean she (using this pronoun because this seems to be the more common suspicion) is trying to get with your husband or boyfriend.

It wouldn’t surprise me if the rates of affairs are actually higher when both parties are in a relationship. Aside from the fact that I have a strong moral objection to infidelity, I think it’s possible that single people have a greater esteem for romantic commitment, due to daily experience of not living with its benefits!

I fully believe that men and women can be just friends. I believe that to be the case for unmarried men and women, just as much as for married men and women. If we believe that we only need to treat our brothers and sisters (yep, it’s time for some Christianese) in a holy and befitting way when one of them is married, then we’ve got the gospel all wrong. 

My brother in Christ is my brother in Christ whether he is married or not. 

That means I have healthy boundaries with him whether he is married or not.

This probably isn’t a popular stance. There is a mild form of “you are my friend with benefits” playing out here in these streets; where, "as long as one or both us are not married or in a relationship, I can behave a certain way with you." I’m reminded of the time a friend of mine got married, and where he would usually go for hugs (the types of hugs I told him made me uncomfortable, but he excused as nothing), after tying the knot, he reached out a palm for a handshake.

That made me wonder… So, now you’re married you think that that interaction is inappropriate, but before it was OK?

I’m not saying hugs are wrong, people, you know that. But there are hugs and then there are hugs. (Y’all know what I’m saying.)

For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you should abstain from sexual immorality; that each of you should know how to possess his own vessel in sanctification and honour, not in passion of lust […] that no one should take advantage of and defraud his brother in this matter, because the Lord is the avenger of all such, as we also forewarned you and testified.

 1 Thessalonians 1:3-5

[This passage could also be applied to taking advantage of someone through sexual abuse, but that’s a discussion for another day.]

The fact of the matter is, we all need to be hyper-aware of “possessing our own vessels” and not “defrauding our brothers and sisters”. I know married folk aren’t here pretending that once they get married, they suddenly don’t notice other attractive people – they just intentionally don’t give inappropriate room to attractive people who are not their spouse.

Likewise, your single friends are already hyper-aware of having healthy boundaries with your partner – and most likely, they ain’t even noticed your partner like that. Please don’t make them feel a need to absolve themselves of guilt when they’ve done nothing wrong.


This isn't an exhaustive list, but I hope it's given you some food for thought, married and coupled people, in relation to your single friends!


Did that resonate with you? Drop me a comment below if so!